Over the past 100 years or so, physicists have come to understand that time travel is all relative: In a sense, we're all traveling through time, and depending on your reference frame, some would seem to be doing it more quickly than others.
![movies about the deja vu theory movies about the deja vu theory](https://news-cdn.softpedia.com/images/fitted/340x180/Deja-Vu-039-s-of-Deja-Vu.jpg)
"It opens the door to doing all kinds of really bizarre things," he said. "It was a kick to be in the room with Jerry Bruckheimer and Tony Scott and the writers, talking about special relativity and general relativity and wormholes," he told .Ĭramer, meanwhile, has done research into ultra-relavistic heavy-ion physics at CERN and Brookhaven National Laboratory - but he's also written two science-fiction novels and pens a regular column for Analog magazine called "The Alternate View." If his experiments show that retro-causality is a reality - that one event can determine the outcome of another event taking place 50 microseconds earlier - it could lend support to the ultimate alternate view of quantum physics.
#Movies about the deja vu theory movie#
He and his colleagues plan to try just such an experiment next year.Ĭramer acknowledged that the concept of retro-causality doesn't seem to make sense, "but I don't understand why not."īoth Greene and Cramer know the science as well as the fiction side of the time-travel issue: Greene is the author of "The Elegant Universe," a best-selling book on string theory - but he also played a cameo role in "Frequency," a time-travel movie released in 2000, and served as a scientific consultant for "Deja Vu." Theoretically, at least, it might be possible for the future to influence the past, said John Cramer, a physicist at the University of Washington. Over the next few years, some experiments hold out a chance of finally being able to show whether or not time can move backward as well as forward. "But many of us, including me, are impressed that nobody's been able to prove that." "Many physicists have a gut feeling that time travel to the past is not possible," said Columbia University theoretical physicist Brian Greene. Man on Fire, his last film with Denzel Washington, was an extremely nasty piece of ultra-violence, set in Mexico.Despite years of debate, scientists still haven't completely ruled out the possibility of going back in time. He's capable of making smart, politically engaged thrillers like Enemy of the State and Spy Game, but usually he prefers to blow things up. Scott is a good technical director of action, a master of the violent modern thriller, but characterisation and interior drama usually bore him. The others are Beverly Hills Cop II, Days of Thunder, Crimson Tide and Enemy of the State. They have made five other films together, starting with Top Gun. It might have been better not to have shot there, to avoid this confusion of meaning, but director Tony Scott and producer Jerry Bruckheimer are not known for their sensitivity.
![movies about the deja vu theory movies about the deja vu theory](https://hollywoodlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Olivia-Rodrigo-Deja-Vu-shutter-ftr.jpg)
I don't think that was the intention but that's the effect. What they now have is an unavoidable sense of the city's grief attaching itself to the meaning, and making the film seem a teensy bit exploitative.
![movies about the deja vu theory movies about the deja vu theory](https://emerituscollege.asu.edu/sites/default/files/ecdw/EVoice16/Hawking3.jpg)
The filmmakers wanted the city's sense of history and time, because this is a story about a man trying to stop the death of a girl who is already dead. The problem is that it now evokes the memory of its recent tragedy. The film was always going to be set in New Orleans and had to be delayed when Katrina hit.